Diversità e Inclusione nello spazio digitale di rete
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-3233/15766Parole chiave:
network digital technologies, ecosystems, standardization, varietyAbstract
Diversità e inclusione vengono analizzate dal punto di vista dell’economia dell’innovazione in una prospettiva evolutiva, facendo riferimento a un tema specifico (accesso all’informazione) lungo la diagonale tecnologica che va dalla stampa a caratteri mobili di Gutenberg alle tecnologie digitali di rete. La tecnologia e il mercato modificano nel tempo e nello spazio il trade-off tra diversità e inclusione, e ciò influisce sul grado di varietà del sistema. Nella transizione dallo spazio analogico (pluralismo di standard, intermediari, mercati) a quello digitale di rete (ecosistemi standardizzati inclusivi, oligopolio di intermediari tecnologici) la varietà di accesso all’informazione è aumentata, ma è inferiore alla varietà potenziale.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Barbrook, Richard & Cameron, Andy. 1996. “The Californian Ideology.” Science as Culture 6(1), 44–72.
Buckland, Michael. 1991. “Information as Thing.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 351–360.
Burke, Peter. 2009. “Coping with Gutenberg: The Information Explosion in Early Modern Europe.” In Briggs, Asa & Burke, Peter (eds.), A Social History of the Media, From Gutenberg to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Castells, Manuel. 1996-1997-1998. The information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Voll. I-II-III. Cambridge (MA) & Oxford: Blackwell.
Dı́az, Sandra & Marcelo Cabido. 2001. “Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16(11), 646–655.
Dubois, Elizabeth & Grant Blank. 2018. “The Echo Chamber is Overstated: the Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media.” Information, Communication & Society 21(5), 729–745.
Ericsson. 2021. Ericsson Mobility Report 2021. https://www.ericsson.com/en/reports-and-papers/mobility-report/reports/november-2021 [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goriunova, Olga. 2019. “The Digital Subject: People as Data as Persons.” Theory, Culture & Society 36(6), 125–145.
Hargittai, Eszter (ed.). 2021. Handbook of Digital Inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hartog, François. 2021. “Altérité, Diversité, Différence : Quelques jalons.” DIVE-IN – An International Journal on Diversity and Inclusion 1(1), 1–11.
Hooper, David U. et al. 2005. “Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: a Consensus of Current Knowledge.” Ecological Monographs 75(1), 3–35.
ITU - International Telecommunication Union. 2021. Measuring Digital Development. Facts and Figures 2021. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/FactsFigures2021.pdf [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Johnson, Hannah. 2020-22. “The pastime of the people: Reading culture in Medieval cities.” In Mark Vermeer & Markus Greulich, ARMA-The Art of Reading in the Middle Ages. European Commission: Europeana. https://www.europeana.eu/en/exhibitions/the-art-of-reading-in-the-middle-ages/the-pastime-of-the-people [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Kallinikos, Jannis. 2006. The Consequences of Information. Institutional Implications of Technological Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Metcalfe, John Stanley. 1997. “Economic Evolution and Technology Strategy.” In Gilberto Antonelli & Nicola De Liso (eds.), Economics of Structural and Technological Change, 49–60. London & New York: Routledge.
Metcalfe, John Stanley & Ian Miles. 1994. “Standards, Selection and Variety: An Evolutionary Approach.” Information Economics and Policy 6(3-4), 243–268.
Nelson, Richard R. & Sidney G Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
OECD. 2019. An Introduction to Online Platforms and Their Role in the Digital Transformation. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53e5f593-en [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Pettegree, Andrew. 2015 (2014). L’invenzione delle notizie. Come il mondo arrivò a conoscersi. Trad. di Luigi Giacone. Torino: Einaudi. 2014.
Rahwan, Iyad. 2018. “Society-in-the-Loop: Programming the Algorithmic Social Contract.” Ethics and Information Technology 20(1), 5–14.
Remotti, Francesco. 2021. “Per un’ecologia delle somiglianze e delle diversità.” DIVE-IN – An International Journal on Diversity and Inclusion 1(1), 112–117.
Riccò, Bruno. 2008. “Legge di Moore”. Enciclopedia della scienza e della tecnica. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/legge-di-moore_%28Enciclopedia-della-Scienza-e-della-Tecnica%29/ [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Saviotti, Pier Paolo. 1997. “Black boxes and variety in the evolution of technologies.” In Gilberto Antonelli & Nicola De Liso (eds.), Economics of Structural and Technological Change,184–212. London & New York: Routledge.
Saviotti, Pier Paolo & John Stanley Metcalfe (eds.). 1991. Evolutionary Theories of Economic and Technological Change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1934 (1912). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shannon, Claude. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal 27(3), 379–423.
Statista. 2022. Smartphones - Statistics & Facts. Published by S. O’Dea, May 31, 2022 https://www.statista.com/topics/840/smartphones/#topicHeader__wrapper [ultimo accesso 30/09/2022].
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2022 Patrizia Fariselli
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
