Altérité, Diversité, Différence: Quelques jalons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-3233/13885Keywords:
barbarian, savage, diversity, difference, identityAbstract
The statement of the research project (Diversity and inclusion, overcoming fragmentation) stems from a current situation: how to combine diversity and inclusion, and how, therefore, to prevent fragmentation? If the questions have an immediately practical (how to?) and local dimension, they also refer to a whole historical, philosophical, religious, political background which comes from far in the history of Europe or of what Europe has become. It is this background that I would like to summon up, focusing on a few moments (for example, the introduction of the Greeks/Barbarians couple), on the setting up of both conceptual and political operators (for example, the 16th century savage becoming a primitive in the 19th century and, in the 20th century, an inhabitant of the underdeveloped, then developing world), by noting certain semantic evolutions (otherness, difference, diversity, racialized, against a background of increasing individualism), as well as the appearance of new concepts or, at least, new uses of these concepts, such as identity, which can form an alliance with difference (the right to be different), with development (since it is conceived in the former colonies as ‘endogenous’) and with heritage (from the most local to the universal). In short, marking some benchmarks and lay some groundwork for a long-lasting conceptual history of the modalities of the relationship between the other and the same.
References
Acosta, José de. 1984. De procuranda Indorum salute. Madrid: Consejo superior de Investigationes scientificas.
Césaire, Aimé. 2004. Discours sur le colonialisme (1950). Paris: présence africaine.
Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine. 2020. “Cheik Anta Diop et l’histoire africaine”. Le Débat 208. 178-190.
Dubreuil, Laurent. 2018. “Contre la politique d’identité”. Le Débat 202. 139-148.
Fabian, Johannes. 2006. Le temps et les autres. Comment l’anthropologie construit son objet. Transl. E. Henry-Bossomey & B. Müller. Toulouse: Anacharsis.
Gauchet, Marcel. 2017. L’avènement de la démocratie IV. Le nouveau monde. Paris: Gallimard.
Hartog, François. 2006. Anciens, modernes, sauvages. Paris: Points-Seuil.
Hartog, François. 2018. Partir pour la Grèce. Paris: Champs-Flammarion.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2006. Le futur passé, Contribution à la sémantique des temps historiques. Paris: EHESS.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973a. “Les trois humanismes.” In Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Anthropologie structurale deux, 319-322. Paris: Plon.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1973b. “Race et histoire.” In Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Anthropologie structurale deux, 377-422. Paris: Plon.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. “Race et culture. ” In Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Le regard éloigné, 21-48. Paris: Plon.
Mastronardi, Severo. 2019. Un laboratoire pour l’étude des régimes d’historicité, Histoire et développement à l’Unesco 1945-1980. Paris: École des Hautes études en Sciences Sociales (Thèse doctorale).
Morgan, Lewis. 1971. La société archaïque. Trad. Halie Jaouiche. Paris: Anthropos.
Pagden, Anthony. 1982. The Fall of Natural Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roy, Olivier. 2019. L’Europe est-elle chrétienne?. Paris: Seuil.
Stocking, G.W. Jr. 1987. Victorian Anthropology. London: Free Press.
UNESCO. 2020. Textes fondamentaux. Édition révisée comprenant les textes et amendements adoptés par la Conférence générale à sa 40e session (Paris, 12-27 novembre 2019). Paris: UNESCO. (https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372956_fre/PDF/372956fre.pdf.multi.page=6)
Whittaker, Charles R. 1989. Les frontières de l’Empire romain. Trad. Christian Goudineau & Christine Castelnau. Besançon: Annales littéraires de l’Université de Besançon.
Wolff, Francis. 2017. Trois utopies contemporaines. Paris: Fayard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 François Hartog
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.