#Soundwordsmatter: Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Twitter discourse on racism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2785-3233/15763Keywords:
epistemic modality, evidentiality, racism, public opinion, TwitterAbstract
This paper presents the results of a corpus-based pilot study aiming to investigate whether and to what extent epistemicity and evidentiality contribute to the degree of assertiveness of discourse on Twitter. The analysis was conducted on 900 tweets in English, Italian, and Spanish, published between May and June 2020 after the killing of George Floyd in the USA. We explore the epistemic constructions employed by users to evaluate the object of discourse (racism, discrimination), and their use of evidentials for marking the source of information of their statements. The results show that epistemic markers are not frequent in the corpora, but that in most cases they display high commitment towards the truth of the users’ propositions. As for evidentiality, its presence is even lower, especially in the English dataset. These findings suggest that controversial debates on Twitter favour the adoption of assertive and inferential strategies.
References
Anderson, Monica. 2016. “Social Media Conversations About Race.” Pew Research Center. 15 August 2016, http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/08/15/social-media-conversations-about-race/ [last access on 30/09/2022].
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. “Online data collection.” In Christine Mallinson, Becky Childs, & Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. Methods and Applications, 236–249. London: Routledge.
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s semantic map.” Linguistic Typology 2, 79–124.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. “Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach.” Text & Talk 26(6), 635–660.
Berg, Sebastian, Tim König, & Ann-Kathrin Koster. 2020. “Political opinion formation as epistemic practice: The hashtag assemblage of #metwo.” Media and Communication 8(4), 84–95.
Bergqvist, Henrik & Seppo Kittilä. 2020. “Epistemic perspectives: Evidentiality, egophoricity, and engagement.” In Bergqvist, Henrik & Seppo Kittilä (eds.), Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement, 1–21. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Blakemore, Diane. 1994. “Evidence and modality.” In Ron E. Asher (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 1183–1186. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
boyd, danah, Scot Golder, & Gilad Lotan. 2010. “Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter”. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5428313 [last access on 30/09/2022].
Bryan, Tacicia. 2016. Black Lives Matter Toronto: A Qualitative Study of Twitter’s Localized Social Discourse on Systemic Racism. Toronto. Ryerson University (MA Dissertation).
Carney, Nikita. 2016. “All lives matter, but so does race: Black lives matter and the evolving role of social media.” Humanity & Society 40(2), 180–199.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1986. “Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing.” In Wallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 261–272. Norwood: Ablex.
Charlow, Nate & Matthew Chrisman. 2016. “Introduction.” In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality, 1–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew Francisco, Bruno Goncalves, Filippo Menczer, & Alessandro Flammini. 2021. “Political polarization on Twitter.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 89–96, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14126 [last access on 30/09/2022].
Cornillie, Bert. 2009. “Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories.” Functions of Language 16(1), 44–62.
Dafouz-Milne, Emma. 2008. “The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40, 95–113.
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1997. The Interaction of Modality and Negation: A Typological Study. New York: Garland.
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. “Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18, 83–101.
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2001. “The relation between modality and evidentiality.” Linguistische Berichte 9, 201–216.
Dendale, Patrick. 1993. “Le conditionnel de I’information incertaine: Marqueur modal ou marqueur evidentiel?” In Gerold Hilty (ed.), Actes du XXe Congrès international de Linguistique et Philologie romanes, tome 1, 165–176. Tübingen: Francke.
Dendale, Patrick & Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. “Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33(3), 339–348.
Dufaye, Lionel. 2018. “SHOULD in conditional clauses: When epistemicity meets appreciative modality.” In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), Epistemic Modalities and Evidentiality in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 52–66. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.” In Craig Calhoun (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, 109–142. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Gaisbauer, Felix, Armin Pournaki, Sven Banisch, & Eckehard Olbrich. 2021. “Ideological differences in engagement in public debate on Twitter.” PLoS ONE 16(3), 1–18.
González Ruiz, Ramón, Dámaso Izquierdo Alegría, & Óscar Loureda Lamas (eds.). 2016. La evidencialidad en español: teoría y descripción. Madrid & Frankfurt: Vervuert/Iberoamericana.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989 (1962). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
Han, Chung-hye. 2002. “Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions.” Lingua 112(3), 201–229.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. London: MacMillan.
Hart, Christopher. 2011. “Legitimizing assertions and the logico-rhetorical module: Evidence and epistemic vigilance in media discourse on immigration.” Discourse Studies 13(6), 751–814.
Haßler, Gerda. 2010. “Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis: the case of Romance languages.” In Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, 223–248. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Honeycutt, Courtenay & Susan C. Herring. 2009. “Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration in Twitter.” 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4755499 [last access on 30/09/2022].
Hunston, Susan. 2011. Corpus Approaches to Evaluation: Phrasealogy and Evaluative Language. London: Routledge.
Ilie, Cornelia. 1994. What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Indrawati, Desi. 2021. “Critical discourse analysis on representation of racism and solidarity in Adidas’s tweets.” Lingua Cultura 15(1), 109–119.
Koshik, Irene. 2005. Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Kreis, Ramona. 2022. “Data collection, preparation, and management.” In Camilla Vásquez (ed.), Research Methods for Digital Discourse Analysis, 73–90. London: Bloomsbury.
Mancera Rueda, Ana & Ana Pano Alamán. 2020. La opinión pública en la red. Análisis pragmático de la voz de los ciudadanos. Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana Vervuert.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2004. “Evidential and epistemic qualifications in the discourse of fact and opinion: A comparable corpus study.” In Juana I. Marín-Arrese (ed.), Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, 153–184. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
Martínez Caro, Elena. 2004. “Evidentiality and the verbal expression of belief and hearsay.” In Juana I. Marín Arrese (ed.), Perspectives on Evidentiality and Modality, 185–204. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
Mulder, Gijs, 2018. “(Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality: Evidence from Twitter.” In Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop, & Gijs Mulder (eds.), Evidence for Evidentiality, 99–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Nuyts, Jan. 2006. “Modality: Overview and linguistic issues.” In William Frawley (ed.), The Expression of Modality, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Oxford English Dictionary. [Online]. 2022. “Clearly”. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/34093?redirectedFrom=clearly& [last access on 30/09/2022].
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pano Alamán, Ana. 2019. “Condensación y fragmentación del discurso político en Twitter”. In Nel·lo Pellisser Rossell & Joan Oleaque (eds.), Mutaciones discursivas en el siglo XXI: la política en los medios y las redes, 75–92. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Pietrandrea, Paola. 2004. “L’articolazione semantica del dominio epistemico dell’italiano.” Lingue e linguaggio 2, 171–206.
Pietrandrea, Paola. 2017. “Le costruzioni epistemiche dialogiche dell’italiano. Una modellizzazione corpus-driven.” In Cristiana De Santis & Nicola Grandi (eds.), CLUB Working Papers, 90–117. Bologna: AMS Acta Università di Bologna.
Pietrandrea, Paola. 2018. “Epistemic constructions at work. A corpus study on spoken Italian dialogues.” Journal of Pragmatics 128, 171–191.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2001. “The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.” Journal of Pragmatics 33, 349–357.
Ranger, Graham. 2011. “Surely not! Between certainty and disbelief.” Discours 8, 3–22.
Rasmussen, Terje. 2016. The Internet Soapbox. Perspectives on a Changing Public Sphere. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Rubin, Victoria L. 2007. “Stating with certainty or stating with doubt: Intercoder reliability results for manual annotation of epistemically modalized statements.” Proceedings of NAACL HLT 2007, 141–144. Rochester (NY): Association for Computational Linguistics.
Scott, Kate. 2015. “The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 81, 8–20.
Smedley, Audrey. 1998. “‘Race and the construction of human identity.” American Anthropologist 100(3), 690–702.
Smith, Marc A., Lee Rainie, Itai Himelboim, & Ben Shneiderman. 2014. Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Spina, Stefania. 2019. Fiumi di parole. Discorso e grammatica delle conversazioni scritte in Twitter. Roma: Aracne.
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Willett, Thomas. 1988. “A crosslinguistic survey of grammaticalisation of evidentiality.” Studies in Language 12, 51–97.
Wilkins, Denise, Andrew G. Livingstone, & Mark Levine. 2019. “Whose tweets? The rhetorical functions of social media use in developing the Black Lives Matter movement.” British Journal of Social Psychology 58(4), 786–805.
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. Bloomsbury: London.
Zubiaga, Arkaitz & Ji Heng. 2013. “Tweet, but verify: Epistemic study of information verification on Twitter.” Social Network Analysis and Mining 4(1), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Claudia Borghetti, Ana Pano Alamán
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
